I’m very pleased to let you know that my firm, Pitblado Law, has just launched a new and innovative brand into the marketplace. Click here to learn more and check out our new website at Pitblado.com. You can even click here to listen to our new radio ad currently running on CJOB|68. Stay tuned, there’s lots more coming!
We understand that law is changing and we’re changing with it
June 17, 2011
Leave a Comment » | 
Media | Tagged: Media | 
Permalink
Posted by Brian Bowman
Camera ban missed privacy point
March 25, 2010
Last week’s widely reported ruling by Judge Tim Preston that cameras will not be permitted into the Brian Sinclair inquest hinged largely on a desire to protect the privacy rights of witnesses.
But what if some individual witnesses don’t have privacy concerns and actually want their testimony broadcast to the world?
Leave a Comment » | Media, Personal Information, Privacy, Technology, Video Surveillance | Tagged: Court, Media, Personal Information, Privacy, Technology, Video Surveillance | Permalink
Posted by Brian Bowman
Are the media subject to PIPEDA?
September 16, 2009
Is there one set of privacy rules for regular businesses and one for the media? In a past case summary, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (the “OPC”) found that a radio station which had broadcast the name and comments of a caller who had phoned the radio station’s news tips line to relay specific details of a robbery was not a violation of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). Why wasn’t this a violation?
PIPEDA contains provisions aimed at protecting the media’s right to “freedom of expression”, which is a pretty fundamental right worth protecting in a free and democratic society. Specifically, PIPEDA’s privacy obligations don’t apply to “any organization in respect of personal information that the organization collects, uses or discloses for journalistic, artistic or literary purposes and does not collect, use or disclose for any other purpose”. When the collection of personal information is solely for journalistic purposes, journalists aren’t required to obtain the consent of individuals about whom the information relates. The result is that if a journalist’s activities are truly “journalistic” then they can proceed with the collection and broadcast of personal information without seeking permission from individuals. Of course, it’s still a good idea to obtain consent in most circumstances despite the exemption.
When the media collects, uses or discloses personal information for reasons that are not journalistic, serious issues arise as they would for any regular business. In the finding noted above, the OPC determined that the personal information collected by the radio station was intended soley for journalistic purposes. That’s why the OPC was of the view that there had not been any violation of PIPEDA. Any illusion that the media are not bound by PIPEDA is wrong. But there are appropriate exemptions in the law that help them to conduct their important work.
Leave a Comment » | Media, Personal Information, PIPEDA, Privacy, Privacy Commissioner, Security | Tagged: Media, Personal Information, PIPEDA, Privacy, Privacy Commissioner, Security | Permalink
Posted by Brian Bowman
