I recently spoke with R
ichard Cloutier of CJOB regarding how to police what people say about you or your organization online. <<click here to listen>>
How to police what people say about you on the internet (Audio)
March 20, 2013
Leave a Comment » |
Facebook, Internet, Online Reputation Management, Privacy, Social Networking Websites, Website Discussion Boards | Tagged: Facebook, Internet, Online Reputation Management, Social Networking |
Permalink
Posted by Brian Bowman
Online safety for kids (video)
February 26, 2013
From one parent to another, I discuss in this video how you can better protect your children in respect of their online activities. Children talk a lot on social media platforms (i.e. Facebook, Twitter), so if you are not on those platforms, I encourage you to learn more. Please watch this video to learn a few safety tips <<click here>>
Leave a Comment » |
Facebook, Internet, Laptops, Monitoring, MySpace, Privacy, Social Networking Websites, Youth | Tagged: Facebook, Internet, Online Reputation Management, Privacy, Social Networking |
Permalink
Posted by Brian Bowman
What the heck is social media law? (video)
July 23, 2012
It’s one of the newest and most rapidly evolving areas of law, social media law. In this short video, I discuss the area of law and the types of services that Pitblado Law is providing to clients.
Leave a Comment » |
Defamation, Intellectual Property, Online Reputation Management, Privacy, Social Networking Websites | Tagged: Facebook, Intellectual Property, Internet, Online Reputation Management, Privacy, Social Networking |
Permalink
Posted by Brian Bowman
Internet cached webpages: What are they and how can you deal with them?
March 15, 2012
During the course of my practice I’m often asked to provide social media law advice, typically to organizations or individuals who want defamatory, proprietary or privacy invasive content removed from the Internet. Once content has been successfully removed from a website I often discuss with clients issues related to Internet cached webpages. So I thought it would be helpful to provide some general information on what Internet cached webpages are and how you can deal with them in situations where you don’t want to have certain content available online.
What are Internet cached webpages?
When search engines such as Google, Yahoo, and Bing crawl a website, they take a snapshot of what the site looks like at that time. This “snapshot” is known as a cached webpage and it’s stored by the search engine. The cached webpage is what the search engine then uses to determine whether the site matches a user’s specific query.
When a user clicks on the cached webpage, they will be taken to the version of the webpage that was online when the site was last crawled and not the current version. The cached webpage can be accessed when the current version of the site is unavailable due to Internet congestion, a slow website, or the webpage has recently been removed.
How can you deal with Internet cached webpages?
It is very difficult to remove a cached webpage from a search engine if you’re not the webmaster of the website. If you’re not the webmaster and you’d like a cached page removed from Google, Yahoo or Bing, you have three options:
- You can contact the site administrator and ask them to take the steps necessary to have the cached webpage removed from the search engine in question. Google typically responds to such requests from webmasters within 2-3 hours and Yahoo typically responds in 5 hours;
- You can seek a court order or other legal document to have certain content removed from the website/cached webpage; or
- You can just wait until the search engine crawls the site again and updates its cached webpages. This option can take the longest amount of time to see results since it might be 1-2 months before the site is crawled again.
Google offers an additional tool to have a cached webpage removed by a party who does not own the webpage in question. My understanding is that this process will only work for HTML pages and will not work for PDFs or .doc files):
- The webpage must be have been updated since the cached version;
- Go to (http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1663691) and click on Google Public URL Removal Tool;
- Sign in to Google;
- Then it will prompt you for the URL you’d like removed;
- Click Continue;
- Type a word that appears on the out-of-date cached version of the page but not anywhere on the live version. Its better to use single words and not phrases; and
- Click Remove cache.
Given the technical nature of this topic, and fact that I’m not a techie, I’d recommend that you work with a technology professional and not rely on this post. That being said I hope this helps and at least provides you with some general information to get you started.
Leave a Comment » |
Defamation, Intellectual Property, Internet, Online Reputation Management, Privacy, Social Networking Websites | Tagged: Corporate Information, Google, Internet, Online Reputation Management, Privacy, Social Networking |
Permalink
Posted by Brian Bowman
Toyota advertising case raises privacy issues
November 4, 2011
In 2009, a woman initiated a lawsuit against a Californian advertising firm and Toyota U.S.A. because of an aggressive advertising campaign that she claimed was designed to make individuals believe they were being stalked by a criminal (which, in fact, turned out to be fictitious). While the charges are now being dealt with by the Los Angeles Superior Court the case raises issues in respect of the application of privacy principles here in Canada.
In 2008, Toyota Matrix advertised the “Your Other You” campaign which targeted young males. It encouraged individuals to provide someone else’s personal information, who would then receive an invitation to a fake personality test. What really happened was, the “victim” ended up receiving numerous disturbing emails from an imaginary soccer hooligan with a pitbull named Trigger. This impersonator claimed to be on their way to the victim’s house, who had no idea it was a hoax. In order to promote the advertising campaign, a fake social networking account for the stalker was even set up.
How would a similar case play out here in Canada? Under the PIPEDA framework , there would possibly be a violation of the law because of the alleged collection, use and disclosure of personal information without consent. Further, PIPEDA’s requirement that the “identified purposes” of any collection, use or disclosure of personal information would not likely met. Finally, the reasonableness test, enshrined in PIPEDA, would probably be violated. In short, the facts pertaining to the case could put the relevant parties in the crosshairs of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada and courts. As a result, the case should serve as a warning to advertising agencies to ensure that privacy law considerations are thoroughly canvassed with legal counsel before initiating campaigns involving personal information – especially where people are submitting friends’ data.
1 Comment |
Facebook, Marketing, PIPEDA, Privacy, Social Networking Websites | Tagged: Marketing, PIPEDA, Privacy Compliance |
Permalink
Posted by Brian Bowman
Facebook changes privacy settings
September 27, 2011
On September 22nd Facebook introduced a new range of privacy settings aimed at “simplifying” the content users share, namely with respect to photos, personal information and various posts. Facebook says these changes are designed to make it explicitly clear to users who can see what is on their profiles at any given time. Now every time information is shared, the user is given the opportunity to quickly and easily adjust how visible it is to other users. These “inline controls” include where someone tags you in a photo or some other post, allowing you to tell who can see it by simply clicking on the icon in the top right corner. You can then very easily change your privacy settings relating to different types of posts accordingly. You also have the option of using a ”tag review” feature, which allows you to approve or deny posts to your profile before they becomes visible to others. This will likely be the most popular change, because it grants almost absolute control as to what is made visible on your page.
Some things you may not know… Under the default settings, when a person tags you in a status update this will appear on your profile. Therefore you may want to consider using the new tag/post review features in order to allow you to choose whether it makes it onto your wall or not. The default settings are set to “off”. When someone tags you in a post, it will be that person’s privacy settings that have final say over what is visible unless you specifically adjust the settings pertaining to posts you are tagged in. So make sure you personalize your privacy settings individually, because a “one size fits all” approach may not be in your best interests.
Do these changes require you to revisit your privacy settings? Your privacy settings should not have changed from what they were before, however some simplifications have been made. Therefore it is important that you check your settings to see what settings are now controlled “inline” (again, meaning adjustable for each separate post whether it be a picture, post or other information) and make sure that these inline controls are by default set to what you want.
What should you be doing moving forward? It is important to remember that Facebook is continually updating its layout, and this includes its privacy templates. While users should not fear that their settings will completely reset each time such changes occur, they should keep a close eye on new features that may (1) replace an existing feature; (2) remove an existing feature entirely; or (3) introduce something entirely different, which might require some tweaking from its default settings.
Leave a Comment » |
Facebook, Personal Information, Privacy, Social Networking Websites | Tagged: Facebook, Privacy, Social Networking |
Permalink
Posted by Brian Bowman
Are you a spammer? What you need to know about Canada’s new anti-spam law
July 7, 2011
Tired of reading? How about a video to help you learn about Canada’s new anti-spam law?
I’m delighted to let you know about a cool feature on Pitblado’s new website called the “Whiteboard Sessions”, which are vlogs (or video blogs). We’ve just posted a 3 minute vlog of mine entitled “Are you a spammer?“, wherein I discuss:
- highlights of the new law
- why you should care
- an overview of the rules
- penalties for non-compliance; and
- proactive tips to help comply with the law
To watch “Are you a spammer?” please click here>>
Leave a Comment » |
Anti-Spam Legislation, E-mail, Facebook, Internet, Marketing, Online Marketing, Privacy, Social Networking Websites, Technology | Tagged: E-mail, Facebook, Internet, Online Reputation Management, Privacy, Social Networking, Spam |
Permalink
Posted by Brian Bowman
Spam, anti-spam – is it getting better, is it getting worse?
June 14, 2011
CJOB|680′s Geoff Currier recently asked me to participate in his live radio program called “The Nighthawk”. Geoff and callers raised a number of issues: “Spam, anti-spam legislation – is it getting better, is it getting worse, what do we know about how bad spam is in our computers right now?” To hear the answer to this and other questions please listen to the live broadcast recording here>>
Thanks to Geoff Currier and CJOB|680 for the invitation to participate in the program.
Leave a Comment » |
Anti-Spam Legislation, Internet, Phishing, Privacy, Social Networking Websites, Spam | Tagged: anti-spam, Phishing, Privacy, Social Networking, Spam |
Permalink
Posted by Brian Bowman
Privacy Commissioner releases report on online tracking, profiling and targeting, and cloud computing
May 6, 2011
Canada’s Privacy Commissioner has just released the final report of her Office’s consultations on the online tracking, profiling and targeting of consumers by marketers and other businesses. “Most people have no idea about the rich trail of data they leave behind when they browse the Internet, use social networking sites, or engage the geo-location functions of their mobile devices,” the Commissioner observed. Organizations that track the online activities of Canadians must be more upfront about their practices, Privacy Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart has concluded… “it comes down to meaningful consent, which entails informed consent”.
Leave a Comment » |
Device Fingerprinting, Facebook, Marketing, Monitoring, Privacy, Privacy Commissioner of Canada, Social Networking Websites, Technology | Tagged: Cloud Computing, Facebook, Internet, Privacy, Privacy Commissioner, Social Networking |
Permalink
Posted by Brian Bowman
The case against Big Brother at work
April 14, 2011
Here’s a good article in the Globe & Mail’s Report on Business about the thorny issue of workplace monitoring. As I’m quoted by the Globe & Mail, “I recognize employers have risks and obligations to manage data, but on the other hand going to a more Big Brother approach isn’t the answer. And the privacy commissioner and the courts would agree with that.” Read the full article here>
Other related blog posts include Employee monitoring in today’s workplace and Social media: Is your organization’s head in the sand?
Leave a Comment » |
Employee Monitoring, Facebook, Privacy, Social Networking Websites | Tagged: Employees, Facebook, Privacy, Social Networking |
Permalink
Posted by Brian Bowman
